Legal cloud over Indian casinos

June 22, 2012 9:45 am

The recent U.S. Supreme Court ruling allowing a man to sue to block an Indian casino could impact the ability of other tribes to obtain land for a casino, experts said.

In particular, the ruling casts a cloud over the efforts by the Mashpee Wampanoag to develop a casino in Massachusetts. At the very least, the ruling promises to add years of litigation for tribes that want to build casinos. The delay and legal uncertainty may scare off Wall Street investors who have bankrolled the tribes in return for a cut of the future casino profits.

“What the decision could do is erect new barriers for tribes and heighten those that already exist,” Steven Light, codirector of the Institute for the Study of Tribal Gaming Law and Policy at the University of North Dakota, told the Boston Globe.

What is really needed is a full scale look at whether Indian casinos have delivered on their promises. The are more than 400 Indian casinos. Most opened after 1988 when Congress passed the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act (IGRA), which was signed by President Reagan.

The casino boom has slowed recently as the Indian casinos have been hurt by the recession, increased competition and huge debt burdens. But clearly the goals of the IGRA have been met with mixed and troubling results as detailed in Time magazine in 2002 by the great reporting team of Donald L. Barlett and James B. Steele. See part two here.

The late New York Times columnist William Safire summed up how the intent of the IGRA has been hijacked this way: “The poorest of our aboriginal Americans are getting poorer, while non-Indians get rich hiring lobbyists to get federal recognition of a  tribal front for the sole purpose of buying land to build a casino. It is a financial-political scandal of stunning proportions. Under the cover of helping the 28 percent of Indians now mired in poverty, financial vultures and highly paid, revolving-door lobbyists are ripping off the U.S. taxpayer.”

Read the full column here. Ten years later, not much has changed in the way Indian casinos operate. Except now there is an even bigger legal cloud hanging over future expansion efforts.

High Court green lights Indian casino case

June 18, 2012 2:06 pm

The U.S. Supreme Court allowed a lawsuit to go forward by a Michigan man who challenged the legality of opening an Indian casino.

It is a surprise ruling considering the casino is now open. The case could have a broader impact on efforts by other tribes to build casinos.

David Patchak alleged the casino would divert medical resources from residents, increase crime and contribute to air, noise and water pollution. The suit says the casino would destroy the area’s rural character, diminish property values and sully the local scenery.

One could argue a similar impact from almost every casino in the country.

But the difference in this case is that the Indian tribe that owns the casino was not recognized when the Indian Reorganization Act of 1934 was passed. Patchak sued to stop the opening of a casino by the Match-E-Be-Nash-She-Wish Band of Pottawatomi Indians, also known as the Gun Lake Tribe, located 20 miles south of Grand Rapids, Mich. He challenged how the government placed the land in trust for the tribe, saying that the move was illegal since the tribe had not been recognized by the government in 1934.

The Supreme Court ruling means Patchak’s suit can move forward in the lower courts. That likely means several more years of litigation and costly legal fees before a final ruling is reached.

Meet Maryland’s new casino boss

June 4, 2012 12:17 pm

The Baltimore Sun details the tangled business dealings surrounding the Cordish Cos., owner of Maryland’s newest casino.

Cordish has been involved in four other casino deals around the country. The gambling ventures have been brief and included a “handful of lawsuits, false starts and soured partnerships,” the Sun reports. Just the sort of businessman the state wants running a casino. Cordish now owns one gambling property: the Maryland Live casino, scheduled to open Wednesday at Arundel Mills mall.

Interestingly, Cordish was partners with an Indian casino in Florida. The partnership ended badly and also raises questions about the real beneficiaries behind Indian casinos. It is already unclear how long Cordish will keep Maryland Live or how well it will do. A proposed casino about an hour away threatens to cut into its profits and make it hard to compete if it opens. Cordish spoke out recently about the casino market is becoming saturated.

Cuomo’s casino plan: Where’s the beef?

January 5, 2012 2:07 pm

It didn’t take long to dismantle Gov. Cuomo’s economic development plan as lots of sizzle with little steak. The Associated Press’s Mike Gormley says the $25 billion plan doesn’t include any new spending.

The AP’s Gormley writes: “On Wednesday, Cuomo announced $1 billion for Buffalo, $2 billion to redevelop a Manhattan convention center, plus funds to build a new convention center at Aqueduct race track and more to repair 2,000 miles in roads and bridges. Cuomo spokesman Josh Vlasto says much of it relies on existing tax breaks, capital aid, matching federal grants and other resources that will add little or nothing to state spending.”

So where’s the beef?

The reality is Cuomo knows that legalizing casinos is not a slam dunk. So instead he wrapped the casino legalization in an empty box and called it economic development. At the same time, he tried to sprinkle money around to different parts of the state to help buy support. The $1 billion for Buffalo, for example, will help build support from a part of the state where there is an energized opposition to casinos because residents there have seen the negative impact from an Indian casino there.